Questions to All Forest Stakeholders
POV
REI Forest- John Marshall
H.S.
10/26/2010
We believe we should add coyotes in to the
forest. There are too many deer. The deer are
eating and destroying vegetation. Before new
vegetation can grow in, the deer destroy it. With
this many deer, they will end up not having anymore
food or shelter. The deer are hurting
themselves and other animals. If the deer keep
destroying the trees, birds won’t have homes
and they’ll have to go other places and find homes.
If the animals are leaving and going other
places, other places will start getting crowded and
affecting that area too. Reducing the deer
population would benefit the forest, deer, and other
animals. Deer would have more space,
food, and shelter because there would be less of
them. The deer would live healthier lives.
Adding coyotes would be a good idea.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
dream catchers - Insurance Company - NHHS
Ask
10/29/2010
12:36:00 PM
cyotes definatly need to be added, but they might start
eating farmers chickens and
stuff.
From:
bambis buddys - Other Stakeholder - NHHS
Ask
10/29/2010
12:27:00 PM
How would you find Coyotes? What would be done if
coyotes started breeding and the
population of coyotes went up? Also, deer are not
desroying trees, they eat small baby
trees and leaves.
From:
insurance staelers - Insurance Company - NHHS
Ask
10/29/2010
12:25:00 PM
coyotes can be very dangerous animals. what happens if
one of them ends up out of the
woods and hurts a kid who was playing in their back
yard. the coyote also might not be
able to live in th woods unless there is plenty of food
and water. i believe endangered
animals could get hurt by the coyotes as well. And
coyotes rarely eat deer.
From:
the lonely forest - forest - NHHS
Ask
11/4/2010
12:59:00 PM
For the "dream catchers" -you could keep the chickens in
a inclosed area so the cyotes
dont get them
From:
The Keebler Elves - farmer - NHHS
Ask
11/5/2010
11:15:00 AM
i hate coyotes, but i like the idea
From:
Deer Dudes and Dudetes - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:47:00 PM
Why would you want to take out the deer in the forests,
they have done no harm and how
are they hurting the trees? The deer might be over
populating, but that still does'nt mean
that you need to take out all of the deer out because
they are already close to being
extinct as it is.
|
POV
The Fed Up Forest-
North Harford H.S
10/27/2010
Our group is called the fed up forest, we are tired
of deer eating all the new trees and
killing beautiful plants. We are important because
forests produce oxygen, provide shade,
slow erosion, clean our water ways, provide homes
for animals, and make people smile
because they are so beautiful. It takes us many
years to get large enough for deer not to
be able to eat us. We provide deer with food, water,
and shelter which makes us a good
habitat for deer, but our health is threatened in
the process. The issue of deep
overpopulation affects our group because the deer
are eating all of the new sprouting
trees which makes forest regeneration almost
impossible. The forests are dying due to this
issue. Our group wants to bring predators to the
forest so that the deer will die naturally
instead of overpopulating. Bringing in predators
would make farmers have to watch out for
other animals and crops that they farm. This will
affect the hunters by having less deer to
hunt but having more trophy deer for the wall. The
insurance agency will be affected
because there are less deer. This means less people
will get in accidents relating to deer,
which means that they will get less money and they
can�t raise peoples insurance.
Trees are living things, we deserve to not be eaten
and be able to prosper to old age. We
do not want deer to die completely so our solution
is perfect for naturally eliminating some
deer. The deer overpopulation will be able to be
controlled.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
POV
the lonely forest-
North Harford H.S
10/27/2010
The Lonely Forest
I am the forest and according to Neil Gillies
“Forests are the most beneficial land use for
maintaining and ensuring clean water. Healthy
forests store, clean and release most of the
water that recharges groundwater levels and
maintains stream flow.” But see the problem
is with over populated dear the bottom layer of
forest is being eaten away. Neil Gillies
defines this part of the forest as � forest floor is
covered by a rich layer of decaying
leaves and wood, populated by plants (such as
grasses, herbs, mosses, vines, tree seedlings)
and animals (microorganisms, worms, insects,
bacteria, mammals)�. With this part of the
forest missing there is no new trees to re grow the
forest, in the long run this will effect
The understory is the layer of smaller trees and
shrubs below the canopy because the deer
will eat this too! Last there will be The canopy
intercepts and slows rain, and provides
habitat, protection, and shade for the animals and
plants that live in the forest. This will be
here till the trees die.
The way to stop this is threw putting up deer
exclusion fences witch are going up at a rate
of about 5-6,000 acres per year. Inside these
fences they have ample tree seedlings and
wildflowers that have apparently popped up from
dormant seed lying latent in the soil.
Outside of the protected areas there are still some
scattered oaks and other tree
seedlings and occasionally a few wildflowers.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
der shrederzzz - hunter - NHHS
Ask
11/4/2010
10:04:00 AM
Hunter do play a huge part in the environment.If you
bring over animals to start killing
the deer,it might get out of hand.Plus, hunters hunt to
get food.It might be their only
food source.
|
POV
Tree Huggers- North
Harford H.S
10/28/2010
There tree huggers are important because they
provide shelter for animals, they provide food
for small animals. They also provide Shade to keep
it cool outside. This overpopulation of deer
effects our group because the deer our eating our
forrest floors and destroying our habbitats
for the animals that live inside. We would like this
situation to be solved by putting up alot
more fences to keep the forrests clear of deer and
as far as the fences go since some have
been put up the forrest floor actually has plants
growing continuously because the deer can not
get into the forrest to eat the growing plants so
the tree huggers persuade others to put alot
more fences around or in forrests to protect the
forrest life. other stakeholder groups our
effected byu this because the forrest is usually the
number one place that deer go to recieve
food but with the fences blocking off the land the
deer will have to find other resources to get
food including homeowners,and Farmers.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
Doctor Deer - Other Stakeholder - NHHS
Ask
11/3/2010
6:20:00 AM
We believe that putting fences around forest's would be
a bad idea because the deer
would have no where else to go. The woods are the
natural habitats.
From:
Lions and tigers and deer oh my! - homeowner - NHHS
Ask
11/5/2010
7:30:00 AM
We agree with your POV. The deer can still live in their
natural habitat, but the forests
are still protected and can still thrive.
From:
The Tree Huggers - forest - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
2:11:00 PM
If fences were put around the forest, or large parts of
it, the deer wouldn't be able to
get out and the forest would be eaten until the fences
come down, which turns your
solution into an even greater problem.
|
POV
PLANT PLAINTIFF-
Horizons 4H
10/29/2010
We are furious flora. We are angered because the
hunters and farmers have killed off the
predators, leading to an increase in the deer
population and a decrease in the number of new
seedlings and baby trees. We would like for
predators to be released back into the forest. We
tell the farmers that they should just get a llama
or two to keep the predators away, the hunters
that they should stop shooting the predators because
the farmers tell you to, and to just admire
the deer heads you already have on your wall. If
you bring back the predators, it will cut down
on the number of deer in the road and destroying
farmland. The fewer deer in the road, the
fewer car accidents. That would allow the insurance
companies to keep more of the insurance
money. Fewer deer will also decrease erosion from
deer going from one side of the road to the
other up or down hills. It would also make the
farmers richer because the deer would not bother
the harvest and the llamas would protect the farm
animals from predators. The forest also
helps prevent erosion, creates oxygen, cleans the
watersheds, and protects and shelters
animals. We were here first; leave us the way we
were and just watch your kids, pets, and
surroundings instead of rushing about and not paying
attention.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
POV
The Violated Forest-
Turner Ashby H.S.
11/4/2010
“Ahhhh that hurts deer, stop please it hurts
sooo bad!”
That’s what I was crying yesterday, when one of
the deer started rubbing his antlers against
me. Deer are very bad for my health they rub up
against me and chew me up and eat my
seedling and I’m always in danger of becoming a
stunted tree farm of pastureland. Deer are not
a new parasite but a familiar antlered animal.
I hear people talking and they say that larger
deer population may lead to me being shorter
and have fewer species, even in areas without
cutting. My brother in the northeastern states
says the deer overpopulation has been around for
more the 80 years.
Deer change the make up of forests with there
appetites. They prefer certain saplings such
as the sugar maple, pin cherry, and black and yellow
birch leaving other species largely
untouched. In open areas, deer grazing can allow
ferns to spread, stealing valuable sunlight
from some trees.
Thank goodness im not one of them unlucky
saplings, but please try to help out my brethren
trees by doing more research in the overpopulation
of deer. There is still time to stop the deer,
all that needs to be done is smarter animal
population management and we might be able to stop
this problem
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
The State Farm Insurer. - Insurance Company - TAHS
Ask
11/8/2010
12:54:00 PM
I heard the trees and they are in pain!! And the less
the deer exist in the area the less
the trees and forest are damaged. Also the forest are a
much more valuable and not as
easily replaceable as the deer. So i agree with you and
long live the forest and...deplete
the deer.
From:
Phat Farmers - farmer - TAHS
Ask
11/8/2010
12:54:00 PM
I agree with your point of view, and believe that people
need to be more educated about
what deer do to the forest. Your story made me laugh. A
lot.
|
POV
Hawks Eye on the
Forest- North Harford H.S
11/5/2010
Our stakeholder’s group name is “Hawk’s Eye on the
Forest,” and we are the forest. Our group
is important because we are directly affected by the
deer and their destructive eating habits.
They are responsible for making us unhealthy by
limiting or eradicating the regeneration of
our woody and herbaceous plants on the forest floor.
The deer create a visible browse line
which affects all three levels of us, the forest.
We have two solutions to present to solve this
issue. First, we could extend hunting season
slightly, but not so far that we might kill the
newborn baby deer. This may help decrease the number
of living deer during mating season,
thus helping to decrease the number of newborns in
the spring. The second possible solution is
we could build fences to section off parts of the
woods to help preserve some of the natural
wildlife there. The hunters could help us by hunting
more because we all know they would enjoy
a longer hunting season. Foresters could help
provide the fencing to protect the wildlife on the
floor of our forest. Homeowners would affect the
forest negatively because they would want
to rid their neighborhoods and yards of deer and
their destruction, thus pushing the deer back
into the forest. Insurance agencies could help the
forest group by providing money and support
for our efforts to limit the number of deer in
forests near roads. Insurance agencies would
benefit from this because this would also help cause
a decrease in vehicle accidents caused by
deer.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
POV
The Tree Enforcers-
Kemps Landing Magnet S. 6th grade
11/8/2010
POV from the Environmentalist
We are the Tree Enforcers and we are here to
speak our minds about the effects of deer
overpopulation on the environment. The American
ginseng is used for medicine and plants
provide oxygen that all living organism need to
thrive. Without these essential resources the
ecosystem will most likely deteriorate.
This problem of overpopulation destroys many
trees and other plant life. The problem of
overpopulation has almost decimated the ginseng
population and many other plant species. Our
preferred solution is to relocate the deer to an
area where they are living but the population is
dwindling. If relocating is not an option then we
might have to resort to expanding the hunting
season on white-tailed does (female deer). This
would be a last resort because we do not
validate the harming of living organisms.
The cost of relocating the deer would
approximately be around $10,000. Hunting will cost
almost nothing; in fact we will obtain money. The
solutions will provide assistance in promoting
the plant population. If the deer population is not
reduced then the ginseng and other species
of plants could become impaired, resulting in the
loss of jobs. Then if the ginseng population is
impaired then ginseng will cost more and people may
not be able to afford medicine made by
the ginseng.
So overall, the deer population needs to be
reduced or many species will become impaired or
even extinct. The more plant species that die out
the more jobs will be lost. Also medicine using
these plants will not exist meaning a higher human
death rate.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
The Happy Hunters - hunter - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:58:00 PM
I like your POV but what is your suggestion to decrease
the deer population? from,
another KLMS student
From:
The Deer Stalkers - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:24:00 PM
But you do have to pay money to hunt. For example, guns,
licenses, equipment, clothing.
Also relocating will now affect the area people hunt. If
all the hunters are in one area,
then you relocate the deer, what will the hunters do?
|
POV
The Tree Huggers-
Kemps Landing Magnet S. 6th grade
11/8/2010
The White tailed deer species are the smallest
members of the North American deer family.
They are also a keystone species. They are found
from southern Canada to South America.
Deer eat food such as nuts and berries. Deer feeding
has long and short term effects. For
years many people have been giving deer human food
with the thought in mind that it won’t
affect the ecosystem. They are wrong. When humans
feed the deer the deer could become sick
because eating that type of food can be very harmful
to them. People might not know it but
they are threatening the deer’s life processes. The
deer’s population size has had a high human
impact.
Deer feeding in our state, Virginia, is
illegal. But it is allowed in some other states.
Deer
feeding should only be allowed in “deer-friendly”
environments, if at all. A deer’s digestive
system is extremely sensitive to sudden changes in
diet. Deer that are artificially fed lose
their natural wildness and become use to human
habitats, meaning the deer would not be
hesitant to approach a hunter.
When deer get access to human food they start
to not want their own food. This results in
the deer becoming a nuisance and destroying
gardens. You can buy white tailed deer food at
some stores. But you are not supposed to feed it to
them because it has corn in it that the deer
cannot digest. Feeding deer disrupts natural
systems by changing deer behavior, population,
and dispersal.
These are places where there are minimal
threats to deer (ex. hunters, lots of cars, etc.).
Even in these types of environments, deer feeding
should be taken to a small amount. When
deer feeding occurs, it may lead to the deer
becoming dependent on people for food. Also,
when people cannot supply food for human-dependent
deer, the deer may starve and their
population will decrease. This species’ survival
will have a hard time reproducing since all the
deer are competing for food, shelter, and water.
Although deer feeding may give white-tailed
deer a positive relationship with people, the risks
for both deer and humans are just too great.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
Deer Dudes and Dudetes - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:45:00 PM
Very good information THE Tree Huggers! When you said in
our state virginia you
should have put in somwe states. read the deer dudes and
dudetes please
|
|