POV
Screaming Eagles-
Luray H.S.
hunter/farmer
10/18/2010
Kill more coyotes so that deer population will
increase. Put bag limits on both deer and
coyotes to even out their populations. Deer cause
problems for farmers so you want some
coyotes around to keep the population somewhat in
check. But you don't want the coyotes
to become so overpopulated or they'll start killing
livestock.
If the deer population increases, they will
destroy crop production. And overpopulated
deer will cause more diseases. Ticks will give deer
diseases like lyme disease and they will
end up dying anyway. If the deer population
continues to increase, deer will run into the
road and more and more people will get in deer
related car accidents. If the population
gets out of control they will go in peoples yards
looking for food and eventually, safety will
become an issue. If you can't take the task of
farming then you should not be a farmer.
Animals were there before people. No matter what you
do, there are still gonna be
problems because there are always going to be
coyotes and deer. Increasing the bag limits
and working together with local farmers is a first
step. Farmer's land now has a huge
amount of deer and coyotes. We need to work with
them to help contain both animals and
change will be easier by developing partnerships
with local land owners.
There shouldn't be bounties on coyotes or deer
because then people will only kill them for
the money and it will ruin the sport of hunting.
Also, bounties will have to be funded by
local governments, and considering the current
economic situation, where will you get the
money? If its that bad of a problem you could pay
people to hunt on your property or
lease it to sportsman's clubs instead of coyotes
eating your livestock and deer ruining your
crops.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
bambis buddys - Other Stakeholder - NHHS
Ask
11/4/2010
10:13:00 AM
Why would you want to kill more coyotes so the deer
population increase because thats
the problem. But why do humans feel the need to control
evry single thing because all
these animals were fine by themselves before we existed.
And you don't see animals
getting together trying to control our population and
that is the main problem because
the earth is only so big and the more people that are on
the planet then the more space is
going to be taken from farmers to provide shelter for
people so its really not the animals
fault it seems like their overpopulating because their
is alot less of the habitat available
because humans keep taking it so they have to reside in
smaller areas and it makes it
seem like their is alot more than there really is.
From:
Dumb and Dumber Insurance Company - Insurance Company -
JMHS
Ask
11/5/2010
7:02:00 AM
there are as many deer in the city than there is in the
woods and if i was you then i
would get online and hit the books to get your facks
stright.
From:
Car Crashers - Other Stakeholder - JMHS
Ask
11/5/2010
7:02:00 AM
dont kill all the coyotes becaus then the deer would be
over ruled and the y would
get in moreand more crops and if the populatoin is to
hight then the deer would start
to go on the high-ways
From:
The Deer Philosophers - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
Ask
11/8/2010
1:38:00 PM
If the deer populations over occupied, would this affect
farmers and their service in a
negative way?
From:
BA Foresters - forester - TAHS
Ask
11/8/2010
12:44:00 PM
Our first question, much like bambis buddys, is why
would you want to kill more coyotes
and increase the deer population, when deer
overpopulation is the problem. Second,
Your POV contradicts itself. You say to increase the
number of deer, but then you say
that if you do, they will cause damage. You also tell us
to put bag limits on deer and
coyotes in your first paragraph, but then you say to
increase the bag limit in your second
paragraph.Another thing: You talk about decreasing the
number of coyotes, but you
don't want a offered for deer or coyotes. Tell me other
methods of decreasing the
number of coyotes, if people don't usually hunt them
without a bounty. Also, if you want
to increase the number of deer, why would you increase
the bag limit? Doesn't that
decrease the number? Thank you.
From:
The Happy Hunters - hunter - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
2:01:00 PM
Why would you want the deer population to increase? It's
already a huge population.
And if the bag limit is increased the deer population
will decrease but you want the
population to increase so increasing the bag limit would
go against what you want.
|
POV
Car Crashers- John
Marshall H.S.
The Deer
10/26/2010
I think that coyotes shouldn’t be introduced
because hunters keep deer populations down by
poaching. The deer have been killed out almost
completely before by hunters so why do we have
to put coyotes in the area to kill even more of us.
I believe that keeping things the way they
are now would be best because people would be more
at the risk with coyotes in the area. People
are not scared of deer but are of coyotes. The
coyotes also do more damage to everything else
that the people have such as cars, animals, or any
kind of food. Most deer stay in the forest and
are scared of people more than people are scared of
them. The deer only come out of the
forest to get food or something to drink. That is
the only time we actually see them. They also
don’t do enough damage to get rid of them by putting
coyotes in the area with us.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
Hostile Home Owners - homeowner - NHHS
Ask
10/29/2010
11:05:00 AM
We think that ia a great idea.Coyotes should not be
involved with the deer hunting.They
are seperate animals.Deer and hunters are one
group.Coyotes are not part of that
group.Great thought!
Stakeholder_Nam
Tree_Huggin_Hippies
From:
John Deer Farmers - farmer - NHHS
Ask
11/4/2010
10:14:00 AM
if you didn't know there is an active population of
coyotes in the maryland area so
adding a little more would only help to bring the deer
population down. or we could just
expand the deer hunting season a few more weeks.
From:
Phat Farmers - farmer - TAHS
Ask
11/8/2010
12:45:00 PM
I do not believe it would be a big deal of having
coyotes attack people if they were
introduced back into the wild. Wild animals are much
more afraid of us than we are of
them, and if we mind our own business and do not back
them in a corner by scaring them,
they will not bother us. (the humans)
From:
The Deer Rangers - hunter - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:25:00 PM
What exactly is your opinion on deer over-population?What
are your sources? Are
they reliable?What stakeholder group are you?
|
POV
bambis buddys- North
Harford H.S
Animal rites
10/27/2010
We are Bambi's Buddies and we are trying to find
ways to handle the deer over
population with as little killing as possible. Our
group is important because we are basing our
opinions and solutions on what is best for the deer
and will still protect their rights. Deer
over populations effect our group because we are
trying to avoid the killing of deer and if
the deer are overpopulated then hunters would want
to hunt even more deer and that
would not be good for deer. The issue of
overpopulation could be solved in better ways
than by hunting them. For example we could relocate
deer to other parts of the state or
country and instead of using humans killing them we
could reintroduce predators of deer to
the area. Like the coyotes or bears. And some
people would say we could try and use birth
control but that probably wouldn't work too well.
The other stakeholder groups solutions
will effect people who care about wildlife and deer
more so than themselves. At Bambi's
Buddies we don't want to see the killing of innocent
deer and all the other stakeholders will
want to use hunting to try and control the deer
population and that's pretty much it. So
the best option would be to reintroduce the natural
predators of deer to the areas where
overpopulation of deer is a problem and allow the
predators to help reduce the numbers.
This is how we at Bambi's Buddies would like to
control the population of deer.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
Cow Spitters - farmer - JMHS
Ask
11/1/2010
6:37:00 AM
You said in your POV that you could relocate the deer
somewhere else. By doing that
it is going to cost a lot of money to move the deer
somewhere else.
Response
bambis buddys - Other Stakeholder - NHHS
11/4/2010
10:02:00 AM
It will cost alot less to relocate the deer than the
total it costs us now each year
to pay for the damage done to cars,crops, and other
things because the deer
overpopulation.
From:
RAWR! - Other Stakeholder - H4H
Ask
11/3/2010
1:42:00 PM
It isn't just going to cost a lot of money, it's going
to dump the problem on someone
else's lap. How do you intend to make sure the relocated
deer don't destroy their new
habitats?
From:
Tree Huggers - forest - NHHS
Ask
11/3/2010
6:38:00 AM
i totally dont agree with bambi's buddys because i grew
up on hunting, and you guys want
to get rid of the "bambi's" with as little killing as
possible. There's not really any other
way to get rid of them other than killing them. And
referring to the birth control i dont
think that would work so well.... thats my opinion.
From:
Mr Pickles and the J Madness - hunter - NHHS
Ask
11/3/2010
6:28:00 AM
we are part of the hunter stakeholder group. We dont
agree with your idea of killing
other animals like cyotes, and bears instead of deer. If
we did that then the deer will
over populated the area of forest and kill the forest
|
POV
hollow eve- Paw Paw H.S.
wow deer
10/27/2010
Hunters should be allowed to hunt but only if they
pass a safety test. We should keep the
deer population to kind of fair and most help
farmers protect the crops as best as they
can. We should be aware of the deer population so we
can maintain a balance in nature. If
certain qualities of a deer herd are to be
maintained, humans must help control deer
populations. When nutrient limitations alone control
deer populations, most herd health
qualities suffer. Historically, predation was
probably the primary influence when Cross
Timbers deer populations were maintained within the
limits of food, cover, water, and
space. Historical deer predators in the Cross
Timbers were the mountain lion, gray wolf,
coyote, and Native American. The gray wolf has been
extirpated from the Cross Timbers,
and the mountain lion nearly so. Thus the importance
of man's role as a deer predator has
increased.
The only relatively efficient means to manage deer
herd numbers other than habitat
modification is through managing hunter harvest
(i.e., contemporary predation).
Management of deer numbers is necessary to regulate
or control deer herd health.
In rare instances, trapping and relocating deer may
be an option for managers with
relatively abundant funds, labor, and equipment.
However, relocation programs have
problems finding places to take deer unless they
release them into hunted areas because
almost all deer habitats already support deer.
Releasing trapped deer into no hunted
established deer populations simply transfers the
problems to the recipient place.
For regulating deer herds, managing deer quality,
and managing herd health, the most
important aspect of harvest is doe harvest. Doe
harvest is one of the most misunderstood
yet most important aspects of deer management. When
a white-tailed deer population is
near or above carrying capacity, its numbers and
quality cannot be managed effectively
through hunting without harvesting does.
The reasons for harvesting does are the same as the
reasons for controlling cattle
numbers in livestock management. If a livestock
manager removed no cattle or removed
only male cattle from a cow-calf herd and left all
female cattle, eventually he would have
too many cattle. Through time their numbers would
increase to the point where neither the
land nor the manger could provide enough food for
them. From that point on, their health,
weights, reproductive rates, and overall quality
would continue to decline until the cattle
actually started starving. Many deer herds exhibit
this trend where the proper number of
does is not harvested.
The important concept
here is "proper" doe harvest. The proper doe harvest
for a particular tract of land depends on deer
management goals, deer density relative to carrying
capacity, fawn crop, and sex ratio. Proper doe
harvest changes from place to place and it changes
through the years on the same place. For some
situations, proper doe harvest may be no doe
harvest. If a deer herd is well below carrying
capacity and more deer is a goal, a manager would
probably want to harvest few or no deer. For other
situations, proper doe harvest may be as many as 1
doe per 25 acres. If a deer herd has many more does
than bucks and the herd is at or above carrying
capacity of the land, a manager would generally want
to harvest a relatively large number of does.
Deer harvests on an area are generally managed
through harvest quotas. Deer harvest quotas are the
numbers of male and female deer that can or should
be removed from an area during a certain time frame.
When establishing harvest quotas, managers should
consider goals, habitat limits, deer density, sex
ratio, fawn crop, and recent trends in deer
population parameters. Found on a website
www.reasonswhy.com.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
POV
Lymes lovers- North
Harford H.S
medical community
10/27/2010
My stake holder group is the hospitals, we are
important because we take care of injured
people or sick people that deer have injured. Most
people are infecte4d by the deer ticks
most commonly carried disease, lymes disease. Lymes
disease is very dangerous, and if not
treated properly can be deadly, that is why
hospitals need to take good care of people with
limes. If there were less interaction with humans
and deer then there would be fewer
cases of people with this diesis, and less deaths.
If we could solve this problem we most
certainly would, we would do this by supporting
hunters and groups that fight to keep the
deer population down. "We see the tip of the
iceberg, the people who get sick", Dr.
Timothy Lepore, Nantucket's surgeon and tick expert,
up to 10,000 off-seasons (hunting
season) in Nantuckets. We need to make the hunting
seasons longer and more deer need to
be killed, especially in rural areas, where there
are more cars.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
Doctor Deer - Other Stakeholder - NHHS
Ask
11/3/2010
6:42:00 AM
We believe that this is a great idea. This is a good
idea because if there are less deer
then there are less ticks. When there are less ticks the
percent of people infected with
lymes disease decreases.
From:
The State Farm Insurer. - Insurance Company - TAHS
Ask
11/8/2010
12:59:00 PM
This is a great idea and will be affective. But as a
hospital I think you should not want so
many people to use and play with guns for i bet there
are more gun associated deaths
than deer or tick associated deaths
|
POV
Doctor Deer- North Harford
H.S
Medical Group
10/28/2010
The stakeholder group medical is extremely
important. The medical group is important because
we help people know the dangers of diseases
transmitted by deer. We also give people tips on
how to prevent these diseases, and tell people the
symptoms and cures for them. Many accidents
and deaths are from deer. Hospitals have to work
with many people who have been injured in
accidents. Overpopulation affects our group greatly
because the more deer there are the
greater chance you can get the diseases and be
injured in accidents. We believe a solution for
overpopulation of deer would be more open hunting
seasons. With more hunting seasons
hunters will be able to maintain deer more and
decrease injuries and the risk of getting a
disease. We also believe that in hunting being able
to kill two deer at once instead of just one a
day would help to the cause greatly. There is not
as many hunters as there used to be. Maybe
we could attract more hunters to hunting deer. By
paying them or giving them rewards. We
could also have a competition were whoever kills the
biggest buck will get a prize. Also people
with private property that have a large deer
population should allow certain hunters to kill a
few off. Another way is to let some people hunt
without permits. The fact that you have to pay
for a permit to hunt discoutages many people. So
making hunting free would be a quick and
easy way to reduce populations.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
The State Farm Insurer. - Insurance Company - TAHS
Ask
11/8/2010
1:05:00 PM
Hello Doctor Deer, After reading through your POV
statement, I've realized you
stray away from your main topic of "medical issues." You
start rambling about hunting to
contain the growing threat of overpopulation.
However, when you mentioned that
you help provide prevention measures against diseases
transmitted by deer. Can you
please provide us with information on these diseases?
Perhaps some examples? Also,
how will you prevent these diseases from being
transmitted? By killing them off? That
hardly solves the problem, that just opens the door for
more environmental issues. I'd
like some facts. Thanks, The State Farm Insurer.
From:
RAWR! - Other Stakeholder - H4H
Ask
11/17/2010
10:58:00 AM
If you annul the requirement for a hunting permit you
have no way to keep tabs on
the hunters and no way of knowing wether they even Know
about gun safety, bag
limits, hunting seasons, and what you can and cannot
hunt and when and why.
|
POV
School Bus Boys- North
Harford H.S
School Bus Company
10/28/2010
We see the overpopulation of deer as a serious
and urgent problem. Our group is rather
important as we are responsible for the safe and
timely transportation of students to and from
school. The problem of deer overpopulation affects
us because deer are an increasing problem
in terms of collisions with deer. Buses are also
becoming heavier with new and more common
features such as air conditioning, air brakes, and
powered passenger entry doors. What this
means is that, since the bus is heavier, it cannot
stop as quickly in the event that a deer is to
run out in front of it.
We would like to solve this problem by using
fences and deer repellant near all the roads.
This would mean either putting an exclusion fence
along the road or placing plants that are
infused with deer repellants along the roadways.
This is likely to work, as both solutions have
been tested in forest areas and have shown a
significant increase in forest health due to the
lack of deer. The fencing and chemicals both come at
a cost, but the question is not whether we
can afford to implement them, it is whether we can
afford not to. If deer continue to
overpopulate, there will be more accidents between
school buses and deer. School buses carry
the future of America, the next generation,
children. We need to protect the next generation
from harm due to collisions with animals on their
way to school or back home. This solution can
also be beneficial to people such as farmers,
hunters, animal lovers, and insurance agencies. It
benefits farmers because deer will no longer be able
to cross the road to access their crop
fields. This benefits hunter in that the deer will
stay deeper into the forest where they can kill
them. This benefits animal lovers in that less deer
will be subject to death by motor vehicle.
Finally, this benefits insurance companies because
it will reduce accidents with deer, reducing
the cost to the insurance agencies for damaged
vehicles.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
POV
Tree_Huggin_Hippies<3-
North Harford H.S
This group is for animal lovers
10/28/2010
The opinion of the tree huggin hippies are that the
deer overpopulation is not good. Deer get
hit by cars all the time. This is not good because
it can injure not only the deer, but the people
driving the car. We love animals and to see hunters
killing deer is horrible. One thing that
really makes me mad is when I hear about hunters who
shoot deer for no reason and just leave
it. Its one thing to shoot a deer for food, but to
shoot a deer for no apparent reason is just
wrong. Also deer being overpopulated is running down
forest floors. The deer eat all the
vegetation and leave the forest floors bare for the
rest of the animals. One solution we have
came up with is to put barriers in certain parts of
the town. We can put barricades up in
different forest reserves. This will help because
when we keep the deer in one specific spot it
will keep just one forest doing not so good instead
of the deer ruining every forest. In these
reserves we will put food inside the reserves so
that the deer can survive in the reserves. Also
this will help with the amount of car accidents
caused by deer. This will help because the deer
will be barricaded in so they cannot get to roads
and highways. These solutions sound like good
things and I think that Maryland should think about
doing them.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
The Deer Slayers - hunter - LHS-C
Ask
10/29/2010
7:59:00 AM
I am sure that those barracades will hold up forever,
and I am sure that Maryland has
enough time and money to build barracades around the
whole state. I think the only way
to end the over-population is to Slay them in the most
graphic way possible. Barracades
is an awful idea in my opinion. "Barracades are
monuments to man's stupidity" - George
Patton.
Response
Tree_Huggin_Hippies<3 - Other Stakeholder - NHHS
11/3/2010
10:07:00 AM
I find your solution absolutly horrible [See The Deer
Slayer POV on the
Hunters' POV Page]. There is no reason to kill all poor
innocent deer for no
reason at all! Another reason that the baracades would
be a good idea is to keep
diseases within those areas. Disease is a big problem
with deer now and we need
to find a way to keep it
contained.(http://www.cacaponinstitute.org/hs_chat.htm).
People like you are
ignorant and need to get some information on how to keep
the deer population at
a good number without just taking out any deer you come
across. I can
understand putting a deer out of its misery after you
hit it with a car or
something like that, but to go out and kill deer like
its a "game" is just ridiculous.
To me its almost barbaric; "slaying" deer is like a
pathetic way to get your anger
out and your "problems solved." It is a proven fact that
this kind of behavior
(torturing animals and killing creatures weaker and
smaller than you) is showing
early signs of becoming a psychopath, and serial killer.
Hope we got our point
across. Thanks.
From:
RAWR! - Other Stakeholder - H4H
Ask
11/3/2010
2:15:00 PM
In my opinion the best way to do this is to keep it as
natural as possible. Putting up
barricades and hunting deer out of cruelty and for sport
are just counter productive. In
an enclosed space like that the deer would be
overcrowded, disease would spread much
more easily, without the exchange of does and bucks from
separate herds the gene pool
will stagnate and the entire population would be wiped
out. If you are trying to be
humane about this putting a population of deer that is
already well over the carrying
capacity of the entire Chesapeake Bay area into
barricaded parts of the forest and
constantly bringing in food from outside ( which is
highly infeasible economically) is
hardly an ideal solution. There is also the fact that
the forests need some amount of deer
to keep them healthy, also this puts carnivores such as
bobcats, mountain lions, and
coyotes at a disadvantage for finding sizable prey.
While I agree that banning hunting
altogether is foolish I also agree that the wasteful
slaughter of deer won't help either,
in my opinion the best way to resolve this is to
relocate the coyote that have been
encroaching on urban and suburban areas to forests with
over population of deer.
From:
School Bus Boys - Other Stakeholder - NHHS
Ask
11/3/2010
10:02:00 AM
We agree with your point of putting up some sort of
fencing to keep the deer out of
certain areas. It will keep the recently deceased deer
off of the hoods and windsheilds
of our buses. Cleaning deceased deer off of our buses is
our least favorite thing to do
and is something we would like to avoid doing. The
fencing idea will keep the deer out of
the roads and out of our way. "There are more than 1.5
million crashes involving deer
each year..." -http://www.car-accidents.com/deer-car-auto-accidents.html
From:
The Car Life - Insurance Company - NHHS
Ask
11/5/2010
11:12:00 AM
We are animal lovers as well and we fully comprehend
your opinions. However we
have a problem with this statement. �I can understand
putting a deer out of its
misery after you hit it with a car or something like
that, but to go out and kill deer
like its a "game" is just ridiculous. To me its almost
barbaric; "slaying" deer is like a
pathetic way to get your anger out and your �problems
solved.�� Would you rather
kill deer or kill people? Killing deer is not a game it
is a sport and it will continue to be
for many years to come. People that go out and kill
deer are providing people with
food. I guarantee that you are not vegetarians and
probably will never be so how can
you love animals so much and not want to kill them? At
least those people who hunt
deer are not killing people. That�s all that matters. I
hope you rethink what you said
cause you make no sense. You love deer so much then you
can starve.
From:
The Deer Slayers - hunter - LHS-C
Ask
11/5/2010
7:26:00 AM
The natural order of things is for the predetor to kill
the prey, just beacuase we
dont have big sharp teeth and claws doesnt mean we
shouldn't kill deer. We are not
just killing deer for a "game." We clean, process, and
eat the deer meat. You must
eat to survive. Are you going to stop the deer from
eating the grass beacuase the
grass is alive too. Lets all just eat soybeans! yeah
right! Have a great day starving by
not eating meat.
From:
The Deer Rangers - hunter - KLMS
Ask
11/8/2010
9:31:00 AM
We don't agree with your solution. If you put barricades
up the deer would demolish the
vegation and kill the deer anyways. Also if you put
berries everywhere that could cause
even more wrecks and deaths of deer and people. Hunting
deer will help depopulate deer
population and give us food, but if we leave the deer
there other animals could use the
deer for food also.
From:
The Tree Huggers - forest - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:55:00 PM
What are some other solutions to the problem?Would you
first solution require a lot of
money?
From:
Deer Dudes and Dudetes - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:54:00 PM
I think that the barracades are good and bad. They ar
egood because it protects nature
but it is bad becaus ethat blocks people fro mseeing it.
And the best way to get rid of us
deer is to come out on your own. Like the "the deer
slayers" said " Maryland does have
enough time and money but the barracades aren't a good
idea. Why is the deer
population effecting how the people live? I don't see a
problem.
From:
The Bio Squad - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:23:00 PM
"Deer overpopulation is not good". Are you kidding me?
That's kind of obvious. I like
your solution but it should have more detail. How much
will this cost? How will it affect
you? What are the barricades made of? What if A CAR WITH
A HUMAN BEING IN IT
crashes? Those are the types of questions you should
answer instead of STATING THE
OBVIOUS.
From:
Esteban - Other Stakeholder - H4H
Ask
11/12/2010
10:42:00 AM
Dear "Deer Slayers", I find your comment offensive and
crude, and I have no
respect for anyone who would say that. Yes some deer
must be hunted, and the
"Tree_Huggin_Hippies<3" are being overly concerned with
the welfare of us deer,
and their outlook may even seem a bit childish and
simplistic, but that does not mean
you need to "Slay them in the most graphic way
possible"!!! To pick on and torture
someone or something weaker than yourself is just being
a bully, and there is
absolutely NO REASON for you to be so cruel. You disgust
me, and I believe
someone may want to talk to your parents about the
deeper psychological meaning of
your outlook on this matter...
From:
POP CON (Population Control) - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
Ask
11/19/2010
9:52:00 AM
The Tree_Huggin_Hippies have made a good point. It is
important to think about the
animals. Our group has a few questions about your POV.
If you feel so strongly
about the problem of deer getting hit by cars, then why
do you only mention
Maryland with such a problem? Do you have any
information about other states?
Where do you stand on this problem?
|
POV
Esteban- Horizons 4H
A Concerned Deer
10/29/2010
I, Esteban, as a young buck, would have been
quick to say that killing deer, no matter what
the reason, was inherently wrong. I have, however,
matured since then, and I have learned to
look from all sides of a problem. Don’t
misunderstand, I love the forest. I love living here
with
my fellow deer, eating yummy oak seedlings and
trillium.
But life hasn’t been kind recently. There are
so many of us deer that it has resulted in a
shortage of yummy food. Recently I have even been
forced to eat FERNS due to lack of
anything else edible. Some deer, friends of mine
even, have been dying of malnutrition. Just
last week my younger brother, Julio, passed away. It
breaks my heart to say this, but some
sacrifices need to be made for the greater good.
Actions must be taken, I beg of you. No more
young ones should have to die.
My belief is that the hunters should be allowed
to hunt more deer at a time. It will be
unbelievably sad, but the hunters at least will only
take those who have reached maturity. It will
be a heavy sacrifice, but a necessary one. I have
thought long and hard, and this is the best
solution I could think of at this time. If you
reintroduce coyotes and other predators, they will
kill as indiscriminately as hunger does. Even if I
should be one of the deer killed, I would not
mind. I have lived the full life that my beloved
baby brother never had the chance to
experience. That is my opinion, and I shall stick to
it if it kills me.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
Deer Dudes and Dudetes - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:56:00 PM
Don't you believe that, as a deer, you should want to
raise the population instead of
lower it? And why would you want hunters to hunt more if
one of the deer shot was
YOUR FAMILY!? I understand that you will sacrifice
yourself for other deer, but you
wouldn't want your friends and family to get killed. but
i like your solution and the drama
added in the last paragraph.
Response
Esteban - Other Stakeholder - H4H
11/12/2010
10:23:00 AM
You have good point. Loosely speaking I do not want any
deer to have to die.
But due to our population boom, we have been dying
already of malnutrition.
Therefor, though it will require great sacrifice, I
believe that the population
as a whole will benefit from a bit of control. I
wouldn't say that I WANT
the hunters to come. But some steps must be taken, and
hunting seems like
the best way to go. Birth control would be cruel and
unnatural for us deer.
Fencing us out would sentence us to an even slower death
of starvation, even
while we could see the torturous area of abundant food
that lies beyond the
fence. Moving us would break up families, and I do not
know how we would
adapt to the new environment, and lastly reintroduction
of predators I am
STRONGLY against for the reasons I have already stated
in my POV. So
provided that the hunters do not kill our young, I feel
they are the best
solution. I realize that in saying that I am condemning
myself and my fellow
deer to a fate I do not find appealing, but if we must
die regardless, this
way seems the most painless and merciful.
|
POV
PETA SQUAD- North Harford
H.S
animal rights
10/29/2010
PETA is important because it protects animal
rights & at the same time control animal
population without harming any animals. PETA focuses
its attention on the four areas in which
the largest numbers of animals suffer the most
intensely for the longest periods of time: on
factory farms, in the clothing trade, in
laboratories, and in the entertainment industry.
PETA
works through public education, cruelty
investigations, research, animal rescue,
legislation,
special events, celebrity involvement, and protest
campaigns.
We object to the senseless killing of deer.
Deer have a right to live on this planet!
We propose the following solutions to the deer
overpopulation issue:
1. Deer enclosures to protect the forest
2. Contraceptive solutions to make the deer
sterile
3. Balancing the ecosystem by reintroducing
predators
Our solutions are more natural and lets the deer be
a deer.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
Lymes lovers - Other Stakeholder - NHHS
Ask
11/4/2010
10:02:00 AM
i dont agree with your ideas at all, when people hunt
deer they're not hurting the deer
that bad, and who cares its a deer. and when people hunt
they are supporting the
economy by buying guns and ammunition and if they shoot
a deer they have to get it to
the butcher which also puts money in the economy. so
hunting is they best thing that we
could do to control the deer population.
From:
RAWR! - Other Stakeholder - H4H
Ask
11/6/2010
10:27:00 AM
To Lymes lovers, I think that your comments are ignorant
and selfish "who cares it's
a deer"?! " the best thing we can do is hunt deer" ?! I
agree that hunting deer isn't
bad, in moderation! But I cannot agree with your stance
on indiscriminately hunting
deer! "It will fuel the economy"? most hunters butcher
their own meat anyway! I
would appreciate it very much if you would read up on
the effects indiscriminate
hunting has on the environment! Their are laws about
when, where, and what you can
and can't hunt.
From:
RAWR! - Other Stakeholder - H4H
Ask
11/6/2010
10:14:00 AM
I agree that keeping things as natural as possible for
the deer is a good thing,
however I don't think that rounding the deer up and
keeping them in enclosures all
their lives or sterilizing them exactly count as natural
solutions. I do however think
that reintroducing natural predators is a smart idea, I
think relocating the coyotes
that have had clashes with farmers or are encroaching on
urban and suburban areas
will save the deer and the coyotes.
From:
School Bus Boys - Other Stakeholder - NHHS
Ask
11/5/2010
11:19:00 AM
You do not wish to cause any harm upon the deer, however
you would propose
reintroducing the predators which painfully kill them.
Quite frankly i think the first
proposed solution is marvelous, but the second is
unreal, complicated, and costly as
you must treat each deer, and more than once. PZP is a
deer contraceptive. "PZP
requires two treatments the first year, followed by an
annual booster thereafter" -
http://bowsite.com/bowsite/features/armchair_biologist/immunocontraception/PILL
1.htm
From:
The Bio Squad - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:15:00 PM
Did you go straight to the PETA website? The whole
purpose of this forum is to come up
with new convesations and ideas but PETA has already
put these ideas out. Deer may
have a right to live on this planet but people do too.
If some people have to make a living
hunting, what's wrong with that as long as they stay
within limits? I'm confused. And, if
you propose to introduce more predators like coyotes, do
you honestly think that the
farmers will back you up?
|
POV
RAWR!- Horizons 4H
Bobcat
10/29/2010
As a bobcat, I have mixed feelings about the
reduction of the Chesapeake Bay area white-
tailed deer population. On one hand, I am enjoying
the abundance of food because I can feed
myself and my kittens without having to fight other
bobcats for the food. On the other hand,
the eating habits of the over population of deer
destroys ground cover, making it hard to find
enough to conceal myself and my babies, and
decreasing food for the smaller game in my diet,
such as rabbits and rats.
I am also worried about the methods which may
be used to reduce the deer population
affecting other species. If they reintroduce more
natural predators the competition for food
will go up considerable. If they put out monetary
rewards for hunting deer and remove the
necessity for hunting licenses, they will put the
entire wildlife population at risk. I also just
plain disagree with fencing off part of the forest,
I mean, come on! Who honestly thinks a
great big honking fence in the middle of the forest
is going to do much good? Besides that, if
the deer can’t get in, not much else can either, and
that really won’t help.
Despite my previously stated worries, I believe
that reintroducing natural predators such as
mountain lions and coyotes (and a few bobcats
wouldn’t hurt) is the best thing for the forest,
and what’s best for the forest is what’s best for
everyone. Please keep in mind however, that
the solution isn’t fool proof, or risk free. There
will be conflicts between coyotes and farmers,
but this is also an opportunity to relocate some of
the coyotes showing up in the suburban
neighborhoods and places like that back into the
wild. It may take awhile to find the plan that is
truly best for everyone involved but it will be
worth it to try.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
Deer Dudes and Dudetes - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
Ask
11/8/2010
1:43:00 PM
So if you bring natural predators into the wildlife with
an over population of deer, a
lack of ground cover, and animals that eat these bushes,
how would these predators be
even able to catch the deer without them running away?
Most big cats sneak up on their
prey, but since there is nothing to hide behind it would
be difficult to catch the white
tailed deer. So we need to go through a short term of
hunting to moderate the population
and grow back the ground cover, then bring in the deer’s
natural predator and lower the
amount of hunting. But we need to be careful how many
predators we import into the
forest, if we over populate the forest with predators
the deer will be extinct but if we
carefully monitor the population of both predator and
prey for a few years until it is
balanced, our forest might be back to its former glory.
Respond: RAWR!
- Other Stakeholder - H4H 11/22/2010
Thank you for your contribution to the discussion
for a solution, the point you make is a very good
one and I agree wholeheartedly.
|
POV
Supporters of
Firefighters- Turner Ashby H.S.
supporters of the Firefighters
11/4/2010
Due to the over 75,000 wildfires in the US each
year, deer are forced out of part of their
habitat. They are then more densely packed and
forced to search for food elsewhere. The
deer are starting to come out of the woods towards
farms. In order to get to the food on the
farms, they have to cross the road. Many times they
cause accidents because people fail to
watch for the deer crossing the road. The average
cost from a collision with a deer is $3,000.
Over 1.5 million wrecks per year are caused by deer
and elk. Virginia is ranked 7th in the
number of deer related accidents per state. So, not
only do they have to deal with the fires,
they also have to deal with the injuries from the
crashes involving deer. It costs the fire
department time that they could be spending with
their families or getting more training under
their belts and money that could be spend other
ways.
The deer population should be controlled.
Farmers should be able to kill deer that are on
their property. By controlling the deer population
it would save the fire department time and
money and in return keep you safer.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
BA Foresters - forester - TAHS
Ask
11/8/2010
12:50:00 PM
We like the fact that you seem to have researched this
topic well. We also think that you
have a good point in saying that deer cause massive
damage to farms and cost thousands
in repair when hit by cars. What are your plans on
controlling the deer population? We
agree it needs to be decreased, but we would like to
know how you are going to go about
doing so. Thank you.
|
POV
The Deer
Philosophers- Kemps Landing Magnet S. 6th grade
Game Biologists
11/4/2010
Conserving Wildlife
By being the stake holder of a game biologist,
it is our occupation to comprehend and study
about the life of various types of species. In this
document, you will learn how a large amount
of deer are affected by humans, keystone species,
and other organisms.
Many deer usually die because of tick diseases,
such as the common Lyme disease, and the
fatal babesiosis and ehrlichiosis. Experts on ticks
believe that deer living on islands are more
likely to come upon ticks infected with two or all
three diseases. Houses that are constructed
near deer habitats attract ticks closer to humans.
Officials calculate approximately that there
are an estimated 2500 deer about 60 per square miles
in comparison to 10 to 20 per square
mile on the mainland. In conclusion, 246 deer were
killed, much more than the scientists’
estimate of 100.
By the 20th century, they were approximately
500,000 white-tailed deer in the United
States. Tolerated profitable hunting and
continuation of hunting threatened to decrease the
population size of white-tailed deer from a large
amount of its assortment. During that period
of time, several wildlife conservation organizations
were focused on the goal of protecting the
nation’s fatigued wildlife materials. Furthermore,
hunting restrictions were ruled, and the
pursue of female deer was forbidden. Today, there
are more than 20 million deer in the United
States and continue to increase. One way to keep the
deer population rising is by managing it.
During the end of the century, predators including,
wolves, and mountain lions were beginning
to have a new main prey, deer. On the other hand,
habitat changes have enabled deer to live a
healthier lifestyle due to the fact that abandoned
living space has provided large forest land
superlative for the deer community.
Deer habitats impact others by their importance
of stability. Deer generally live in wooded
areas with other animals, deep brush, and other
plants for survival. However, when there is an
over population, when the deer live in the same
ecosystem, or if the reproduction is large, then
the land will become deteriorated. When this
happens, deer tend to move into human population.
This causes major problems for people because deer
can eat our crops and destroy our homes.
If they do not decrease in population, they might
have a fatal diminish in size. Conservation
practices will also help us keep deer out of our
community.
Human impact affects the lives of deer and what
they prefer to consume. People have taken
away a maximum amount of limiting factors the deer
by taking away their habitats and shelter.
Human beings take these needs away from getting our
desires, such as, cutting down trees to
construct architectural buildings and complexes. By
building these organizations humans have
cut down the resources of needs for deer allowing
deer to overpopulate by eating what humans
consider to be waste. Some of what they consume
could be litter or unnatural. However, it can
still harm innocent deer species. The White-Tailed
Virginian deer is a key stone species giving
it great impact on other things such as the food
chain and other organisms. Having a
reproduction of deer could harm other animals of the
food chain.
As the deer are having an impact on others,
they still need to decrease in population, but
they cannot succeed until they have the proper
limiting factors. These limiting factors include
the needs to survival such as proper food and water,
and also natural shelter that is not
invaded. Humans have an impact on White-Tailed deer
and we want to help them reach their goal.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
POV
Deer Dudes and
Dudetes- Kemps Landing Magnet S. 6th grade
Deer Rights Activists
11/4/2010
Did you know that female deer’s are called does
and male deer’s are called bucks?
Virginia’s grown white tailed deer can weigh up
to 150 pounds. The big buck can weigh up to
200 pounds and run at a speed of 40 mph. and clear
an 8 acre field. The world is losing deer
and its population. Almost every year, 3,650 deer
die because of us and how they have no food.
This is because the game agency is trying to wipe
out land where the deer eat and sleep on.
People are still trying to make the world a better
place ,but it just seems like the people end up
destroying and killing for deer and land. They have
a society that protects deer but nobody can
stop this matter. When deer search for food but they
can’t find any or there isn’t enough food
left, the deer die out.
The deer are useful for many things unless they
over populate. When you kill the deer you
can use them for coats, shoes and food. Deer’s are
killed in car accidents and those can kill
people too. Nearly every year 200 people are killed
in car accidents. But 29,000 are injured
because of a car accident with a deer involved.
These accidents occur because deer run into
the middle of the street and the drivers of the car
can’t see them so they run into them and they
get injured. Once there was this woman that was
driving and then she hit two trees trying to be
cautious and trying to not hit the deer, then sadly
she died. The reason why she hit the deer is
because the deer had no place to eat. The deer was
looking for food and who took the food
away? It had to be the game agency. They tried to
make the deer move and go seek food
elsewhere. Because of the early settlers taking out
natural deer predators, the nature or deer
population has increased to the point where it is
unbearable. Instead of seeing deer in their
natural habitat, some people testify that they have
seen them in their neighborhood.
Our solution is to bring back deer’s natural
predators to their natural habitats, so the
population can be lowered, and the plants that deer
eat can be restored and other animals that
eat that same food will not perish of starvation.
Tigers love to eat deer, so if we bring tigers
back to forests, maybe over the years we can see a
decrease in deer population. The population
is so big, deer cannot get the correct resources
necessary for their survival, and we want to
help that. We can lower the population, saving the
deer and other animals that eat the same
food, and end the problems we face every day of deer
eating our gardens, deer being hit by
cars and trucks that cause death to the deer and
possibly the driver, and deer being found in
our neighborhood.
Please help us in our fight to save the deer
and the animals that are similar. Remember, we
may be using ideas that kill deer, but it is for the
better, not the worse. Even though, the law
does state that we cannot kill deer at mating
season, it seems like the farmers help our problem,
they try to help themselves, but they dint know that
they are killing a species. We can’t live
without them. Do people really want to lose
something that it seems like we already loss?
Please
benefit to our cause to help the white-tailed deer.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
The Deer Rangers - hunter - KLMS
Ask
11/8/2010
9:31:00 AM
You said that the deer population is too low in the 1st
paragraph. Then your solution
states that you will bring in the deer's natural
predators to lower the population. Why
would you want to lower the deer population if you say
the population is too low? This
makes no sense. Where did you get your information and
how do you know it is accurate?
Response
Deer Dudes and Dudetes - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
11/9/2010
1:39:00 PM
Well we got that info from the newspaper. But your
question is, sadly,
inaccurate. You said that we said the deer populations
were too low, but we
never said that. We said that the population is lowering
because of car crashes.
As an Animal Rights Activist, we want to lower the
population, but we don't want
to lower it tragically, in ways such as car crashes.
Thank you for your input!
From:
Esteban - Other Stakeholder - H4H
Ask
11/12/2010
10:42:00 AM
I really like your POV for the most part, but TIGERS? I
kindof hope you were trying
to be funny, because I'm pretty sure that if we release
wild tigers in Maryland that
would cause many more problems then the deer
population... As I'm sure you know,
tigers are NOT native to Maryland, or even to this
CONTINENT. They are also
dangerous animals who may kill more then just deer. If
COYOTES can kill young
humans, can you imagine what a freaking TIGER would
do?! I really did like the rest
of it though..."
|
POV
The Bio Squad- Kemps
Landing Magnet S. 6th grade
Game Biologist
11/8/2010
“We fight for life”
Our stakeholder group, the Game Biologists, are
important because we limit deer
populations, take part in trap and release, radio
tracking, and we work with the Fish and Game
Agency to control hunting seasons. Game biologists
limit the amount of deer hunters can kill
and analyze the way hunting affects the deer
population. (51)
The deer problem affects us because there is so
many deer that they are killing off the
other animals that we study. We get many complaints
from farmers and homeowners and we
want our community to be happy about where they
live. (43)There are many possible solutions,
but not all are necessarily good for us. One
solution is killing deer, but it seems inhumane. We
could build fences, but that is usually ineffective
and can hurt the deer and still allow some
predators. Restrictions on hunting are good but are
not proving to be truly effective. (50)
We think that we have discovered a solution for
deer management that works for everyone,
including the deer. If we trap an amount of wild
deer using a tranquilizer gun and darts that
will still allow hunters to hunt, we can send them
national parks and zoos in controlled
environments similar to their natural habitat all
over the United States. This will reduce deer
population density in the problem states and allow
people in other states to enjoy the white-
tailed deer while still letting the hunters enjoy
the hunt. This way, we do not harm the deer, but
we reduce population. (91)
The cost of this project is about $500,000. We
will get this money by conducting a
fundraiser that benefit you by hosting a fair that
sells food, towels, stickers, and other
miscellaneous items. We will have to give up part of
our funds for this project.
This solution will benefit us, our community,
and our wildlife by increasing the amount of
other wildlife availible for study. It will allow
others to watch deer but still keep deer alive.
If the deer population decreases, we would NOT
disappear but we would lose an important
animal to our study. We do not want white-tailed
deer to go extinct.
We would be more willing to participate by
giving the people involved a free card to let
them see the deer at the zoo and/or national park of
their choice three times after the project
is complete.
The solution could be structured to make our
group prosper by giving us publicity and
allowing us to keep better track on the populations
and make the deer population at an
acceptable level.
We could not be harmed by reducing deer to
protect our forests because it will give us a
better chance to further explore other species and
possibly discover more organisms that are
hard to explore when the deer population thrives.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
POV
The Deer Stalkers-
Kemps Landing Magnet S. 6th grade
Animal Rights Activists
11/8/2010
The Animal Rights Activist is important because
we keep track of the amount of deer and
the places where the deer eat the most. The deer
problem affects us by having too many deer
die because of cars collisions, hunters killing
deer, natural disasters, and animal behavior. We
can solve this problem by controlling how much
hunters kill in a year, or people would stop
hitting deer with cars. We could fix this by people
slowing down in their cars so they don’t hit
the deer. Hunters threaten deer and stop their
natural reproduction from happening. Hunters
are a stakeholder in the deer food web because they
kill the animals with their guns and lower
the population. If they hunt more deer, then the
population will decrease, and the deer will
eventually die off. Even though hunters get money
for killing deer, deer give natural
satisfaction in zoos, traveling in a forest, or
wandering in nature. The ecosystem is being
affected by random deaths of the species of deer.
The community doesn’t like dead bodies in
their community. What if you were a deer….? Would
you like to get shot or hit out of nowhere?
I didn’t think so. If you don’t like being shot,
that means deer don’t like to be shot. Deer have
feelings just like everybody else.
We need proper management on the deer
population. The human impact on deer is happening
a lot, as in there are many people hitting or
killing the deer, weather it’s on purpose or on
accident. If nobody is hunting the population of
deer, then it will overgrow. If too many people
hunt, then the population will decrease and will
become endangered. The solutions will not cost
us in any ways. The solutions benefit us with a
controlled population and no problems we have
to deal with. We could be making it more fun and
entertaining yet academic. Our points of
view are having the population controlled, and then
keeping it controlled so we will not face
this problem.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
Deer Dudes and Dudetes - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
2:02:00 PM
I would just like to let you know that the population is
alreadt too HIGH! Why would you
want to raise the population if it is already to high?
Please explain and list your
resources because your POV has nothing tom do with the
absolute facts
From:
The Farmers From Across The Field - farmer - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:22:00 PM
We can solve this problem by controlling how much
hunters kill in a year, or people would
stop hitting deer with cars. Sen.3 Par.1-The Deer
StalkersWhat does this sentence
mean?, How would you control how much hunters kill in a
year?, and what would happen
if the deer population got too low?
From:
The Deer Rangers - hunter - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:09:00 PM
If you slow down cars you will cause a lot of traffic?
Everyone will be honking to speed
up the traffic and there will many more wrecks? To where
we have slowed down cars for
no reason? The deer will never come near the road then?
From:
The Bio Squad - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:02:00 PM
Isn't there already deer crossing signs, speed limits,
and hunting restrictions?.Please
explain how this is a new (or valid and working)
solution?
|
POV
Wildlife Preservers-
Kemps Landing Magnet S. 6th grade
Fish and Game Agency
11/8/2010
Group Slogan: Why Waste Wildlife? (WWW?)
Our group, the fish and game agency, is
important because we protect nature and balance
the percentage of hunting deer and game animals. We
can change the season that people hunt
deer so deer population can stay at a positive
percentage. Our group can change a certain
hunting season if the population gets too high or
too low. We can change the law so people can
only hunt certain types and amounts of deer, fish,
and other game.
Deer overpopulation affects our group because
other species or organisms (not deer) run
out of food when deer overeat. When overpopulated
deer share one space, there isn’t enough
room for other game. Overpopulation can cause our
fish and game agency to have to work much
more with laws and rules. It can cause us more work
and makes it harder for people to obey.
Our solution for deer overpopulation is to make
hunting season longer for the spring (when
deer most commonly mate) so deer population would
decrease. It can be a negative to our
personal and livelihood experiences because we would
have work less and not get enough
money. It can be positive because the deer will eat
less and the creatures that can’t eat much
because of the deer will be able to eat and deer
will reproduce. We will change deer hunting
seasons with firearms to be 5 days longer each (note
there are many hunting seasons). This will
cause deer population decrease rapidly if we
continue to hunt in future years. Once deer
overpopulation is at a balance then our agency will
stop the extra length of deer hunting
seasons. Since most hunting is done by the use of
firearms, this plan will be effective.
If the solution doesn’t meet our agency’s
standards deer overpopulation would make us have
to create laws. This would be negative because deer
are a keystone species. This would
threaten the food web and wildlife because the deer
take too much room. With large amounts
of deer population density, there will be
competition between different species.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
From:
The Bio Squad - Other Stakeholder - KLMS
Ask
11/9/2010
1:13:00 PM
Int the first paragraph, you said your group"s job is to
change hunting laws. However, in
the second pargraph you stated that changing laws gives
you more work. Then in the
third paragraph, you said the solution has a negative
impact because it would make you
work less. This didn't make sense. Also, how could the
longer hunting seasons affect the
ecosystem rather than your job?
|
POV
Creature
Conservation Cops- Kemps Landing Magnet S. 6th
grade
Fish and Game Agency
11/9/2010
CCC (Creature Conservation Cops)
“Save the ANIMALS because they save YOU!”
The CCC has a very important part in the deer
population management. We control the
hunting seasons and determine the hunting laws. If
we did not put a law on the deer hunting
season then the deer could overpopulate. If the deer
overpopulated and ate a lot of the wildlife
then the wildlife would die out and there would not
be enough for the later deer and they would
die out. The deer also might start eating the other
animals because their food would be gone.
After a while, if we let the deer population stay
very overpopulated then eventually the food
web would be destroyed. But if the deer were hunted
too much then they would become
endangered and the wildlife that they eat would die
out. The CCC is responsible for making the
population of the deer even. That is why the CCC is
so important.
The deer are destroying the forest and it is
the CCC’s job to take effect. There is too much
demand and not enough supplies. Also since the deer
population is high; it is threatening other
species because there are not enough plants to feed
all the herbivores. This will cause
competition between the herbivores. Since the deers
are eating too much food so that other
organisms will soon starve. That means that the CCC
will also have to help the animals that are
becoming extinct because of the competition. The
CCC has a solution to stop the deer.
Since CCC has power over the hunting seasons,
so if we make the deer hunting season longer
( like around 4 months long) and make the hunting
season of the predators of the deer (like
bear and bobcat) shorter ( like 3 weeks), than the
deer population would go down. But to make
sure the deer population density does not get too
low, we can make it so that the hunters can
only shoot 10 deer (4 buck and 6 doe) in one year.
This will make the farmers not have to kill
them off and the deer will not steal their crops.
Also, the grasslands and berries will have a
chance to grow, making the forest able to keep the
all the threaten species.
The solutions could affect the people
personally and their livelihood. One example would
be
that more money would be spent and less money would
be paid to employees. Another would be
that if the deer are kept, the species population
size will continue to grow, making our job
harder to save the other species. If the deer are
moved, the deer would not be able to be
monitored by the CCC and will more likely be over
hunted. However, if the CCC does not do
anything, then the deer will take over the forests.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
POV
Game Squad- Kemps Landing
Magnet S. 6th grade
Game Biologist
11/9/2010
We are game biologists. Game biologists
generally need a graduate degree to get a job
higher than the technician level. Prior experience
in environmental groups (government or
privately operated) and special skills can be very
helpful in landing a position. The pay is
higher than that of wildlife technicians but may
require more time in the office. Game
biologists are different from game wardens and may
be involved in trapping and release of
game, radio telemetry, mortality studies, captive
breeding, and other programs researching
animals for humane and economic reasons (2009,pg.1).
Game biologists are key stake holders in
our community. We are important because we collect
information on animal populations to try
and figure out how to steady their numbers. We do
this for many organisms including white-
tailed deer. Human impact is a large factor in
species survival. The white-tailed deer
population density is supposed to rise and fall at a
steady pace. However, in recent years the
population size just keeps increasing and seldom
decreases.
The current increase in deer population can be
very harmful to areas with high human
population because not only could the deer eat the
resources that humans need, but the deer
could even come in and invade humans' living areas.
There have already been numerous
incidents of things like car accidents and deer
breaking windows on a house. However, there
is little room for error when trying to decrease the
deer population and there can be many
negative effects of decreasing the population too
much.
Although there are many problems already with
overpopulation, the problems would become
even worse if the population density of deer was to
become endangered or even extinct. If the
population stays high, then other species on the
area could be negatively affected, such as
rabbits. Furthermore, if the deer population is
decreased too much, then white-tailed deer may
be permanently threatened because their chances of
being able to reproduce fast enough is
highly unlikely. If the population is decreased too
much then many people could be affected
such as hunters. A species’ survival depends on the
right habitat, food, and population of other
species. In the case of white-tailed deer,
competition for food between deer and other
organisms is a huge threat in the population size
problems. The overpopulation of deer can be a
big problem. We as game biologist can be affected
by the overpopulation of deer. An example
is the population of the predators will go higher
than it needs to. This overpopulation will lead
to other species decreasing in size. This will mean
less food for us. If this continues our
wildlife population will plummet. We are in a crisis
of over population. All of the keystone
species and the habitat are being threatened by the
population of deer. If all the species died
out there will be no need for game biologist any
more. We might be able to stop the
overpopulation of the white-tailed deer species if
we continue this fight to keep the
environment at a perfect balance.
It is our goal as game biologists to work on
safely decreasing the population of the white
tailed deer in order to not only protect other
species but to protect us humans. We plan to put
more predators in the area and to possibly raise the
hunting limits so that hunters can more
effectively decrease the population. We are
confident that we will be able to decrease the
deer population enough so that we can save the other
species.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
POV
POP CON
(Population Control)- Kemps Landing Magnet S.
6th grade
Game Biologists
11/9/2010
POP CON (Population Control)
“Popping Control on Game Everywhere”
“What if I were to become a deer, and live in the
forests, picking and eating fruits and roots-
by Guru’s Grace, I am a sacrifice to my Master.
Again and again, I am a sacrifice, a sacrifice”
-Sri Guru Granth Sahib.
Deer are pushed away from their natural
habitats in which they live. The animals are also
over populated. This is when game biologists come
to help the wildlife. Game biologists are
very important for the safety of deer and other
animals in the ecosystem. They regulate the
harvesting and hunting of deer and limit the fishing
seasons. They use captivity in order to
help regulate the population size of deer. They
also plant different species of scrubs and
other plants and try to help the population of the
deer and help reproduction. Game biologists
are needed for the wildlife life.
Game biologists trap deer where there is an
over population of deer and them release them
elsewhere. They release deer where is not so
populated with deer because if they didn’t, the
wildlife living in the over populated areas would
reach its limiting factors. The population
would drop dramatically. Game biologists can also
make hunting and trapping seasons for deer
if there is an under population. Captive breeding is
another way for game biologists to control
the population of deer. This will allow the animals
to populate but have less of a population size
in the habitat. These are the solutions game
biologists would prefer.
As our being of game biologists, the natural
limiting factors and our solutions to the
population density of the deer, could possibly wipe
out our livelihood. This could happen
because the hunters wouldn’t be able to hunt as
much, thus the wardens would have little to do.
Also the hunting regulations could possibly be
reduced, which would be a decline for the
hunters as well .The wildlife such as rabbits,
squirrels, and other small animals, would be a steak
holder in the reduction of the deer population.
So, there would still be species to watch the
population size of. If the population is reduced,
then we as game biologists could have less
work to do. Then we would be sitting around the
water cooler telling jokes.
The deer population is starting to
overpopulate and all the plants in the surrounding
areas
are being eaten and the deer will have to move to a
new habitat. Game biologists are becoming
involved and have started to let hunters kill more
deer and are putting the deer in captivity so
breeding can stop. If the deer population keeps
getting too out of control then the all of the
game biologists could be terminated because people
would think that we could not do our jobs
correctly. It is vital to control the deer
population so that the plants will not die out and
so that
the game biologists can keep their jobs.
In conclusion, game biologists do their best in
order to help the deer and the environment.
The overpopulation is a problem that is difficult to
solve. With the methods used by game
biologists the overpopulation crisis can be
reduced. Game biologists plan to get involved and
help the deer.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
POV
The Devistated Does-
Kemps Landing Magnet S. 6th grade
Animal Rights Activists
11/9/2010
The Animal Rights Activists are important to
the environment because we can manage the
population of deer and other organisms affecting the
environment without harming them in any
way or limiting their food supply. We can also
think of what’s best for the deer instead of
threatening them or making them ill. As humans, we
should consider how the deer feel about
being poisoned and shot at. How would you feel if
this was happening to you? It’s also
important to manage the deer’s food web and
population density. There are not enough limiting
factors to support all of the wildlife including the
deer. This is the reason for the population
being overbalanced.
This problem is affecting humans because the
overpopulation of deer forces the deer to
spread into human communities and more people will
want to hunt deer and cause environmental
issues. The deer population size has doubled in
size in the last 15 years but that is no reason to
kill deer. If the hunters kill too many deer than
deer may become endangered or extinct.
Our solution to the problem of overpopulation
is to close roads and highways once a month
and move vast amounts of deer into different states
and cities without a large deer population,
putting into consideration that the deer would have
to adapt to a new ecosystem. Then park
rangers or animal rights activists can observe their
competition and predators. If the deer
population starts to deplete drastically then deer
can be moved into different areas so they can
survive. If this solution works then forests will
be restored and become lush and green again.
This possible solution may affect the
livelihood of humans today because we have taken so
much of their habitat and used it in many ways like
construction areas or building houses. It
will also affect us by the way we from now on handle
the deer population.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
POV
The Green Team- Kemps
Landing Magnet S. 6th grade
Environmentalists
11/9/2010
Hello,
The population of deer is rapidly growing;
therefore the natural resources are becoming
scarce. Competition is starting to come into play.
There are not enough predators to take down
the deer population, so that means that deer
population will just keep increasing until they move
into the cities. Do you really want that to happen?
The environmentalists strongly support the
hunters because they have a clean way to get rid
of over populating the deer. Millions of plants
could be saved because the hunters shoot the
deer instead of cutting down forests. Since other
organisms eat the same thing as the deer,
those organisms may be spared instead of them dying.
The doe seasons are also a good way for
bringing the deer population down. If the hunters
kill bucks then deer population doesn’t go
down much. By the environmentalists supporting the
hunters, the people support us. Having the
forests helps people and animals.
This is a great solution. If the Government
creates a temporary law that states that there
will be less bear hunting during hunting season. If
you have this going on for a certain amount
of time, there will be a decrease in deer
population. The bear will consume the deer because
the
bear are predators and the deer are the prey. The
bear and the hunters doing their thing will
help control the deer population growth. This idea
would also be environmentally friendly
because it is natural for bear to eat deer. After
the deer population is under control the
government will take off the temporary law and will
now allow the hunting of bear. Then the
deer population will be back to normal.
Thank you!
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
POV
Save the
Dear Deer Association- Kemps Landing Magnet S.
6th grade
Animal Rights Activists
11/10/2010
POV
We are the animal rights activists of the Save the
Dear Deer Association. This association
is about balancing the deer population in wildlife
areas. We are important because we
protect the deer from over hunting and decreasing in
population. Deer are a key stone
species and are over populated in many places.
Animal rights activists are greatly affected
by deer overpopulation. Without deer, there would be
nothing to fight for. Their prey does
not affect any other animals when they need to eat.
They are mainly herbivores. There
definitely is deforestation, but it's worth it to
keep what was once at a low level of
population size at a balanced population size. Some
possible solutions that affect everyone
at our association personally will most likely not
affect our livlihood. The Save the Dear
Deer Association proposes a solution to the deer
population that will decrease the
population but will not go as far to extinction. It
is to not deprive the access of deer from
the hunters, and try to balance the population of
deer. They are moving into cities and
towns, causing accidents, and over harvest their
resources. There is not a real risk with the
cost of our solution, but the resources that we
need are already in peoples possession. We
may have to give up parts of the deer's ecosystem to
successfully complete our solution.
The solution will not only benefit us, but will
benefit the hunters, farmers, and many other
organizations by keeping deer away from their crops,
and giving people more to eat. We
hope to reduce the deer population size to balance
the herd where it will not harm us or
any other organization. We're almost always going to
be around and will not disappear if
the deer population is not reduced. The easiest way
to understand our solution is to fence
off parts of the forest and let it grow back to its
normal size while the deer population
decreases. We believe that if we all decide to
follow this solution, the deer population will
decrease and the forest size will be restored.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
POV
The Sportsman's Heaven Wildlife and Game Agency-
Kemps Landing Magnet S. 6th
Fish and Game Agency
11/10/2010
The Sportsman�s Heaven Wildlife and Game Agency
Our agency, the Sportsman�s Heaven Wildlife and Game
Agency, is very important in the
management of deer. We regulate the amount of deer
that are hunted each year and
enforce game related laws. We are important because
we make sure that game
populations don�t fall to low or grow too high.
Lately we have been focusing on the rising
deer population. The population size has been too
big for too long because of lack of
limiting factors. This keystone species has been
rising dramatically and are threatening
local wildlife and organisms. Deer venturing out on
to roads causes major traffic hazards
to drivers. In 2008 in Maryland, 1,962 deer-car
collisions were reported. The population
density leads to lower amounts of vegetation in
surrounding areas. The deer problem
affects our agency greatly because we issue the deer
hunting licenses so we have to know
how many deer can be hunted per year to maintain a
healthy ecosystem.
We have developed a solution that will benefit
our group and other groups. Our agency
will send out a team of expert scientists to monitor
the deer population. They will count
the amount of deer and evaluate their effect on the
environment. Using this information,
we will determine the amount of deer that each
license allows to be hunted. This will
benefit the hunters because all the hunters will be
allowed to hunt each year. This will also
benefit the environmentalists because there will
always be a healthy deer population in the
environment. If the deer population was too high,
each license would permit a greater
amount of deer to be hunted. If the population was
too low, each license would permit a
lower amount of deer to be hunted, allowing the deer
population to grow higher.
This solution would not directly damage our group
because the hunters would not get
angry because only a few of them could hunt, and the
environmentalists would have a
healthy environment. The only cost to our group
would be the money that we had to use to
hire the scientists to assess the deer population.
We are already willing to participate because we
understand the dire need to reduce the
size of this keystone species population.
If the deer population was reduced too greatly,
our group would gain money because
there would be a higher demand for licenses which
means the price of them would rise. On
the other hand, if the deer population is not
reduced, our group would make more money
that way because there would be more deer to hunt.
This means that we could sell more
licenses.
Our solution allows our group to prosper because
hunters will always be able to buy a
license, making us gain money. This solution would
help the environment because there
would always be a healthy deer population, which is
our main concern.
Join the Thoughtful Discussion
Thoughtful Discussion
|
|