|
Farmers
lonely farmers
Hampshire H.S.-Moore
4/1/2008
Many people blame most of today’s problems on the
local farmers. I completely disagree
that it is the entire farmers fault. Of course the
Chesapeake Bay is getting hit hard.
Farmers, homeowners, waterman, recreation and tourism,
and of course the fish is getting
hit hard. Every person that lives in the area is at
fault.
Farmers for years now have been using fertilizer on the
fields, normally it is manure, but it
was a slow process of what has happened. Many farmers do
use best management
practices. For example, my family uses all types of
buffers, sediment ponds, and has put
aside land that is not used for agricultural reason
along the streams. Everyone knows that
the increase in phosphates is a bigger problem with the
watershed. Well, not only farmers
use phosphates, homeowners also use them. People do not
realize that when you wash your
hands the soap has phosphates in it. For many
years, as I said, farmers have been
fertilizing. We all know that it is a slow process of
getting into the stream. Today, there is a
much bigger problem. Any type of animal processing
plants is normally placed along rivers.
Many people do not realize the amount of hormones that
is used to raise a chicken in four
weeks. It use to take six months to a year, depending on
what feed was being used ; now it
is taking four weeks to raise a bird. Come on, now yes
it is a field of agriculture but it is
industry. So, it is just not farmers.
Now there are ways for farmers to lessen the speedy
process. Many farmers have been
contacted by many groups to help them lessen the
problem. For example, my family has
planted new trees around all stream access, and cut off
all animal access. Place buffers
around the water source if it is necessary to
production. Place gravel or stone to make a
walk way for the livestock. There are many ways that
will help lessen this problem that one
day could damage the Bay for good.
In order to fix or delay the problem everyone needs to
help one another. Homeowners, if
you want clean, healthy water stop using as much soap,
or harmful cleaners. An alternative
to harsh cleaners is vinegar. Using the harsh cleaner is
actually dangerous to you and your
bathroom facility. It breaks down the liner in the tub.
So, use less soap and less cleaners,
use natural things. Industries already have regulations,
but my personal opinion is slap some
more on. Don’t allow waste from the plant to flow down
the rivers. People all around this
watershed eat the products of what is causing the
problem.
So, in order to fix the problem everyone NEEDS to help
ONE ANOTHER!!! Stop blaming
the other person for all of our faults. In conclusion,
everyone is at fault from the farmer
to the homeowner right on into the industry.
Ask a Thoughtful Question or Respond
Thoughtful
Questions
From:
DORY-DORY FISH - Waterman - MHS
Ask
4/8/2008
If we used less soap and less cleaners, don't you
think that we would be a little
dirty? and what do you suppose the we use for soap
that is natural?
Response
lonely farmers - farmer - HHS
4/10/2008
9:49:00 AM
Not necessarily. Back in the old, old days they only
took a bath maybe twice
a month, if they were lucky. In today's society it
has been pounded in our
mind that we must take a bath everyday. When it has
been proven that it is
not the best thing, it dries our skin out. Many
people today do not work as
hard as they did, so you shouldn't stink. The type
of soap that was mainly
used was lye soap. Which is made from lard and other
natural resources.
Also if you get a bad case of poison ivy, lye soap
works wanders.
From:
Home Jackets - homeowner - MHS
Ask
4/8/2008
I liked that you stated your family in this. The POV
takes a personal turn, but you
forgot to mention that homeowners also use
fertilizers, and many homeowners don't
use a best management practices.
Response
lonely farmers - farmer - HHS
4/10/2008
10:26:00 AM
Although, you didn't formally ask a question, I just
want to comment back.
That is an excellent point. Thanks for including
that. Homeowner also use
fertilizer, but many people would say well, its not
in large amounts. Well any
amount will cause problems. Also, the fertilizer
they use, if they have a well,
it goes into their drinking water, so they are
hurting themselves.
From:
fishies - CB_Ecosystem - MHS
Ask
4/8/2008
what problems are blamed on local farmers?
From:
DORY-DORY FISH - Waterman - MHS
Statement
4/11/2008
well that is lovely but i like my Victoria's Secret,
and its not tested on animals. and i can also
go to the store and buy lotion for my dry skin...
some people work hard in a day, harder
than in the olden days, and they are very dirty, i
think that they deserve to take a bath
every day if they want.
From:
The Forester Boys - Other - KHS(K)
Statement
4/11/2008
Do you have proof that that farmers have nothing to
do with the pollution problem in the
bay?
Response
lonely farmers - farmer - HHS
4/15/2008
I believe you are right lonely farmers. Manure can
cause toxins to the fish killing
them and polluting the water. It is truly the
farmers faults they are the ones with
the fertilizer not us. If the manure gets in the
water fish die, and our drinking
water turns discusting.
Response
lonely farmers - farmer - HHS
4/23/2008
It is not all of the farmers fault. Yes, farmers do
use fertilizer; to produce the
food you eat. So if farmers didn't use FERTILIZERS
you would go hungry.
Homeowners also use fertilizers. It beats me why,
when they complain about
destroying the water. Do you use FERTILIZER on any
of you lawns or gardens?
From:
The Pitchforks - farmer - MdSA
Ask
4/16/2008
Dear Lonely farmers - how would using less soap
impact our Bay? i understand that
there are chemicals but have there been tests or
data to show that soap has that great
of an effect?
From:
Wayward Farmers - farmer - MRGS
Ask
4/23/2008
Firstly, you focus a lot of what other stakeholder
groups can do...what does that have to
do with farmers? Secondly, farmers do have
responsibility in polluting the bay (by the
way...could you mention what you're doing to help
the bay?) and though they are not the
only ones to blame, they are not faultless. It would
be nice to see you admit to the
detrimental effects farmers have on the bay and what
you can do to fix it. Thirdly, are
there are any alternate practices to your chicken
farming idea that are equally effective
that will not risk putting hormones into the bay?
Otherwise, it's a well written paper and well
developed ideas...I would just like to see
more thought on your own responsibility as a
stakeholder group. Thanks!
|