Developer
CDM Bulldozers
Buffalo Gap H.S.-Riley
4/3/2008
The developers living in the Chesapeake Bay run-off area
have come to the conclusion that
cleaning up the bay has more cons than pros in the final
outlook and these are our reasons
why. It will be more costly for these developers to
provide ways for the run-off from
their construction sites to not reach the Chesapeake
Bay. It will also reduce land for
development as well as the production of these
developers. Taxes affect everything, and
of course if this clean up were to take place, everyone
would be made to pay more taxes.
When looking at the pros of this decision to clean the
bay, we have decided that it would
give the developers a better name in the eyes of their
customers as the bay would be clean
and the developers would not be blamed for the
pollution. It would also allow construction
businesses to hire more employees who will be available
to work with the construction
needed to clean the bay. Therefore more job positions
would be open and available to those
who need them.
Some may argue that the developers need to take control
and be the first to begin the long
process of cleaning the bay, but as developers, we
believe that cleaning the bay is a bad
idea on our behalf. Not only will cleaning the bay cost
us more money personally, but it will
reduce the land we will be using in the future. If
cleaning the bay is the final decision made
by the government of Virginia, then we as developers
will be happy to help, but we will not
be the first to bring the problem to their attention.
When we as developers look into the
future, we see the bay being cleaned at some point and
it will more than likely benefit us;
but now it is against our wishes that the government
continue to push the fact that the bay
need to be cleaned.
Ask a Thoughtful Question or Respond
Thoughtful
Questions
From:
DORY-DORY FISH - Waterman - MHS
Ask
4/8/2008
do you think that everyone should participate in help
cleaning up the bay? Would you
participate? Honestly.
It might be more costly now but in the long run wouldn’t
having the bay less polluted
boost the economy and make products from the Chesapeake
cheaper?
Response
CDM Bulldozers - developer - BGHS
4/25/2008
Yes, we believe that everyone should participate in
cleaning the bay and yes, we
would participate too, but what we are trying to say
through our paper is that the
developers should not be held responsible for all the
pollution to the bay. Even
though we more than likely contributed to the pollution
it would not benefit us as
a group to take the action to cleaning the bay. If
another group or organization
were to head up the cleaning then of course we as
developers would help as well.
From:
DB Defenders - Waterman - JWHS(T)
Ask
4/17/2008
You may not be concerned about the clean up of the bay
now, but do you think that
waiting to clean it up could be potentially stalling the
resolution of an increasing problem
that would effect you and all other groups in the
future? It seems that it may just be
avoiding the enevitable while letting the problem grow.
Response
CDM Bulldozers - developer - BGHS
4/25/2008
First of all, we ARE concerned about cleaning up the bay
because it would be
benificial to us as well as all the other groups. We as
developers are not stalling
or waiting for someone else to clean up the bay, we are
simply awaring you and
the other groups that it would be more costly for us as
developers to take the
first action. If another organization were to begin the
process, then we would be
more than happy to help; we are not avoiding anything.
You're right, the problem
is increasing, but it is not our job to take the first
action. We all need to come
together and take the first action.
From:
MRGS CONTRACTORS - developer - MRGS
Ask
4/23/2008
overall, i liked your paper. it was a good point of view
from the perspective of a
developer who doesn't agree with the movement to help
clean up the Bay. But why would
everyone be forced to pay more taxes? I think you should
elaborate and explain that a
little bit more. Also, what are some of the jobs within
the construction business that help
clean the environment? Also, in the long run, costs for
building and supplies would even
out over time so eventually things would not be as
expensive. So wouldn't it be better in
the long run to spend a few extra dollars in the
beginning to clean the bay to help boost
the economy, making the cost of things cheaper. I think
that the developers should play a
bigger role in helping clean the bay because they do
contribute some major pollutants;
not just wait around for someone to clean it for them.
Response
CDM Bulldozers - developer - BGHS
4/25/2008
I agree, we do contribute to the pollution of the bay,
but so do you ane
everybody else. If another organization were to begin
the process to cleaning the
bay, then we would be more than happy to help. How can
you say that taxes
would not be a problem? The government just wants more
reason to make us pay
taxes and cleaning the bay would be a prime example of
this. You cannot tell me
that taxes would not go up. If you have not noticed, the
cost of everything is
rising and it is not expected to stop anytime soon, so
the cost for buildings and
supplies would be expensive. Nothing will be cheaper
anytime soon.
From:
Fishin' Impossible - Waterman - MRGS
Ask
4/23/2008
You started out your paper saying that cleaning up the
bay has more cons than pros.
Where is your evidence for this? You never gave
specific examples of the cons. In your
paper, there were far more pros discused and you
admitted that cleaning up the bay
and reducing run off from construction would be
beneficial. After reading your paper,
I am only more convinced that builders need to take
their part in keep the bay clean.
Response
CDM Bulldozers - developer - BGHS
4/25/2008
Builders do need to take their part in cleaning the bay.
No one has said that they
didn't. What we are saying is that it would be far more
costly to us as developers
to take the first action to cleaning the bay. If
another organization were to be
the first in cleaning the bay then of course we woould
do our part.
From:
Anti-Wilderness Progressive Movement - developer -
JWHS(T)
Statement
4/23/2008
I really like your point of view. It covers all the
points that us developers need to
consider. It shows others also that we have considered
our options but it comes out that
developers will lose too much, and the economy will be
devastated by our actions.
Amazing POV!!
|