|
Watermen
Fishin' Impossible
Massanutten Gov. S.-Newcomer
3/31/2008
As fishermen, we represent a portion of the constituency
whose lifestyle is and will be
directly and severely impacted by the degradation of the
Chesapeake Bay. As stakeholders
representing an industry worth over 500 million, we take
a significant interest in the
preservation of the health of the bay. Our livelihood
relies on the Bay, as does the
economic welfare of thousands of other people and
industries: the restaurant industry, the
tourism industry, and the commercial and private
boating industry are all directly impacted
by the quality of the health of the Bay.
The Bay suffers degradation due to pollution in effluent
levels. The primary pollutants
include excessive amounts of nutrients such as
phosphorus and nitrogen, sediments from
erosion caused by lack of wetland buffers, and harmful
chemicals introduced to the Bay by
runoff. These have precipitated effects such as
frequent algal blooms that lead to
eutrophication and a rise in water temperatures, causing
a reduction of the level of
dissolved oxygen in the water.
Fishermen in the Bay have observed a significant
decrease in catch rates of fish and
shellfish. The key factors in the loss of crabs have
been habitat loss and increased nutrient
load, with consistent harvesting at unsustainable
levels putting excessive stress on the
crabs. A recent study of the health of fish and
shellfish populations in the Bay found that
the Blue Crab is at 57% of its optimal biomass
existence. Oysters have also been severely
impacted by sedimentation and exist currently at 9% of
its optimal biomass existence. The
levels of striped bass, the most sought-after
commercially harvested fish in the Bay, had
plummeted from excessive, unsustainable harvest.
However, after the regulations on
commercial bass fishing were tightened, the striped bass
made a swift and hugely
successful rebound to its original numbers, now at 100%
of its optimal biomass existence
The most important issues in the restoration of the Bay
are reducing the levels of nutrients
flowing into the Bay, and promoting the sustainable
commercial harvest of vulnerable fish
and shellfish by enforcing higher restrictions on the
annual fish harvest. To reduce the
levels of nutrients entering the Bay, we propose to
lobby for incentives for farmers such as
tax breaks or subsidies for those who exercise
“best-management-practices.” BMPs such
as maintaining a riparian buffer zone between fields and
waterways, cover cropping, and
utilizing buffer strips are all methods that farmers can
use to reduce the infiltration of
excessive nutrients into the watershed, and also
drastically reduce erosion and soil
degradation. Offering tax breaks and other incentives
to farmers who utilize these
practices will provide the impetus for a grassroots
movement to help clean up the Bay.
While the incautious farming practices are a significant
cause of many of the Bay’s issues,
we, as fishermen, can participate in the effort to
restore the Bay’s health as well by seeking
alternate forms of part-time employment, abiding by new
laws and regulations, and
promoting an informative campaign. If fisherman found
part time jobs constructing cleaning
utilities and fish nurseries for the bay, they would
better be able to reduce their catch and
maintain their lifestyle. A congressional bill
tightening the restrictions on commercial fish
harvests would ultimately greatly reduce the stress on
the fish population of the Bay. If
the fish and shellfish of the Bay are not harvested at
sustainable levels, then we will
continue to deplete the population at alarming rates,
spelling ultimate doom for the aquatic
creatures on which we build our livelihoods. If more
stringent regulations are placed on the
commercial harvest of fish and shellfish of the Bay,
combined with efforts to reduce
nutrient levels, it is very likely that we may
observe a similar rebound in numbers of oysters, crabs,
and other fish.
Ask a Thoughtful Question or Respond
Thoughtful
Questions
From:
Home Jackets - homeowner - MHS
Ask
4/8/2008
I thought this was nicely done. It was definately
well-thought out, but what about
chemicals from industries entering waterways? Chemicals
cause a lot of problems in
the fish we eat.
Response
Fishin' Impossible - Waterman - MRGS
4/23/2008
Chemicals entering the Chesapeake Watershed definitely
affect the prosperity of
the Bay and thus you have a valid question. However,
the Chesapeake Bay
Foundation observed that irresponsible farming practices
have a much more
severe affect on the Bay in regard to the quantity of
nutrients entering the Bay.
Even though the industrial pollution will eventually
have to be addressed, the
agricultural pollution remains the most potent threat to
our lifestyle. Thus, we
decided that the installation of measures countering
industrial pollution must take
a back seat to the mass amounts of sediment
contaminating life in the Bay.
Seeing that solving the sediment problem and restoring
the aquatic biomass in the
Bay would immediately help our lifestyle, we decided
that that was the most
feasible and proper rout to take in regard to
maintaining the watermen lifestyle.
From:
Chicken Kickers'' 101 - farmer - MHS
Ask
4/11/2008
How do you know that your lifestyle will be impacted by
the degradation of the Chesapeake
Bay?
Response
Fishin' Impossible - Waterman - MRGS
4/23/2008
Our entire livelihood is dependent upon the state of
the Chesapeake Bay; all of
our income can be traced back to the quantity and
quality of the fish that we
catch. In addition, our lives have already been greatly
affected by the
degradation of the bay- dead zones have cordoned off
huge sections where we
used to be able to fish and those fish we do catch are
smaller and more sickly
than ever before. Therefore, it's quite easy to see how
the continued
degradation of the bay, would affect our lives and
livelihoods.
From:
Chicken Kickers'' 101 - farmer - MHS
Ask
4/11/2008
As fishermen, what would you be prepared to do if water
pollution got really bad?
Response
Fishin' Impossible - Waterman - MRGS
4/23/2008
As watermen, we depend on the Chesapeake Bay for many
things. It represents
our livelihoods, our jobs. It is a way for us to provide
for our families. If the Bay
is being polluted and fish are being killed, and this
degradation continues, it will
affect our ability to catch healthy fish. This will
affect our lifestyle because we
will not be able to support ourselves, and we will be
forced to try to find other
jobs or ways to compensate. This is not fair to us,
because as watermen, we have
a good understanding of what needs to happen to keep
the bay healthy, and we
do our best to maintain that health. Pollution and other
problems influencing the
water quality and aquatic life of the Bay would make it
harder for us to continue
catching as many fish as we are currently, and we would
eventually have to come
up with an alternative plan.
|